Now that the two sides have agreed, some public and national experts are concerned about the costs that Will Pay Seoul for U.S. troops stationed in South Korea. Critics say Seoul`s amount has already increased by about 40 percent over the past decade, and many say it would be more beneficial to invest that money in strengthening the national armed forces. In 2009, South Korea paid about $690 million for defence cost-sharing, and is now expected to pay about $1.2 billion per year under the new agreement. After three days of negotiations in Washington, South Korea and the United States finally concluded their talks on the Special Measures Agreement (SMA) following a statement by the South Korean Foreign Ministry on March 8. The SMA negotiations – which cover South Korea`s contribution to the costs of the Korean armed forces (USFK) – had been stalled since last year, so the previous agreement expired without being replaced. How important it is to ensure a stable deployment of the U.S. military to Japan and the smooth and efficient operation of Japan and the United States. Security measures, at a time when the security situation around Japan is increasingly serious, the Japanese government is supporting the rent of U.S. military facilities and territories and funding for the Facility Facilities Improvement Program (FIP) as part of the Status of U.S. Forces Agreement. Under specific agreements, Japan also bears labour costs, incidental costs and training transfer fees for U.S.

forces in Japan. The failure of the talks had real consequences, as about 45% of Korean employees working for the USFK had to be laid off because of the agreement reached last year. In the absence of an agreement, the South Korean government and the National Assembly were to meet to temporarily pay workers by enacting a new law and enacting executive orders. The ADM agreements had already been reviewed every five years until 2018, when the Trump administration insisted on annual renegotiations. Seoul wanted and expected to find a long-term agreement to maintain a stable alliance and ensure the security of the Korean peninsula. With Trump taking advantage of the annual negotiations to call for a drastic increase in Seoul`s contributions to defense, many experts have said that signing a one-year term is not in South Korea`s national interest. Neither the Department of Foreign Affairs nor the Ministry of Foreign Affairs gave details of the agreement, including the rate of increase in defence costs and the duration of the agreement. However, the Wall Street Journal reported that the new agreement would be valid until 2025, while Reuters reported that it was a six-year contract.

News agencies have often quoted anonymous sources at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with limited official statements on the current part. The agreements between Seoul and Washington must be ratified by the South Korean National Assembly after their official signing. Experts expect the ADM to be completed by the end of March. Both the Japanese and U.S. governments conducted a comprehensive review of the NSH to make it more stable, effective and effective, and signed a new special measures agreement on January 21, 2011. The new agreement came into force at the end of March this year after Derein`s approval.